SPIRITUAL PROSPERITY

Depression and anxiety appear to be two different emotional responses humans are capable of having.  We do not usually associate these two disorders with each other. But research has shown that depression and anxiety do in fact co-exist, much to the detriment of their sufferers.

When you picture someone with depression you think of all the normal symptoms associated with it: Despair, hopelessness, anger, fatigue, an unwillingness to be a part of society and a feeling of being overwhelmed by everyday life. A depressed person withdraws into themselves and seek to sever all ties with the outside world.

Anxiety attacks on the other hand seem to happen for no reason at all. Feelings of fear and panic happen in situations in which most people would be perfectly calm. These anxiety attacks come on suddenly with no warning and with no outright reason for them to happen. After awhile a sufferer of these attacks begins to live in fear of the attacks themselves, wondering when the next one is going to happen. Before long, and without treatment, both anxiety attacks and depression can begin to affect the sufferers lives in negative ways by not allowing them to hold a job, have a relationship, or even go out into society

What many sufferers of these two diseases do not realize is that either one can lead to the other.  Being depressed can weigh heavily on the mind leading the depressed person through a maze of different emotions. This in itself can lead to anxiety and eventually panic attacks. Panic attacks signify a loss of control and when this happens more and more often the sufferer can become depressed with their situation of not knowing if and when the next attack will occur.

Why these two disorders seem to occur at the same time is still largely unknown. But many studies show that major depression is often accompanied by an anxiety disorder. Both are likely caused by an imbalance in brain chemistry, but exactly why the two seemingly opposite disorders can coexist in the same person is not completely understood. What is understood about anxiety disorder is that the fight-or-flight reaction in the brain does not work the way it is supposed to. It can go off at any time, even in seemingly peaceful situations. Those who have anxiety disorder always feel that they are in danger.

One thing that psychologist agree on is that having a combination depression and anxiety is much more debilitating than having just one or the other. It can take patients with both disorders a much longer amount of time to resolve their depression which makes treating them much harder. It has also been shown that people who suffer from anxiety and depression both have a much higher suicide rate.

While this sounds bad their are options for treating both these conditions. Anti-depressant medications can be used to treat both depression and anxiety. When these medications are used in conjunction with behavioral therapy there is a high success rate of treating depression accompanied by anxiety.

Many studies have been done to research the effects of motivation and mental health. As the implications of helping those with negative self-esteem, depression and anxiety are immense this is certainly an area of research that deserves a great deal of attention.

Psychology Online reports on a study investigating the differences between INTERNAL and EXTERNAL MOTIVATION. The report states that "Although our society is largely extrinsically-motivated by external rewards such as money, fame and power, research has indicated those who are intrinsically-motivated by inner desires for creativity, fulfillment and inner satisfaction are psychologically healthier and happier."

How can this help you?

The study of health psychology seeks to understand how our ability to cope with stress can help us to prevent illness and promote health. Some of these coping mechanisms are naturally inborn but may be taught to those who lack them. Motivation is one of the tools that researchers are trying to use as a combatant of negative stress reactions.

Motivation is something that we use every day. It's what enables us to survive - to get food because we're hungry, to go to work to pay the bills or to educate ourselves in order to pursue a higher goal in life.

How we respond to life's demands can affect our overall health. How are you classified?

The same report on Psychology Online identified those who respond to life with negativity or anxiety as most likely to deal with the physical affects of anger, guilt, nervousness, frustration and fear. These emotions can cause hypertension and high blood pressure which can lead to heart attack or stroke. Other complications include ulcers, arthritis, asthma and kidney disease.

Some therapists suggest that by using positive self-talk and trying to restructure the WAY we look at events can offset the physical and mental effects of dealing with negative or stressful events in life.

Interestingly, people who tend to focus on themselves as the controller of their fate - in fact 'self-motivated' - are more likely to feel a sense of control when stressors affect them. Instead of blaming something or someone else they have the motivation to deal with a problem and look for a reasonable solution. This positive behavior helps them to achieve goals and find personal contentment.

Therapists try to teach patients how to emulate this positive reaction to stress and use their motivation as a source of empowerment. Learning to manage stress and using motivation to set goals, work through a problem or fix it can in turn promote better mental and physical health.

Over the centuries much has been written about the anguish; philosophers and thinkers have described the importance of this feeling differentiating of fear and despair.
In my opinion the anguish is human feeling that is positive so is meaning to words like "eternity", "existence" and "The nothing".
When human beings are capable of making sense of those words means that it has entered a higher level of thinking with respect to the common man.
It is at this level of independent thinking where anguish is positive because it allows us to analyze, understand, visualize our own existence, plus it allows the man (or woman) to be truly aware of their freedom, their actions and their consequences.
In that sense, we can understand the thinking of Kierkegaard who raised the "anguish" in the ethical stage distinct from the aesthetic stage. For the common man clinging to the stage aesthetic world of the senses, anguish is unproductive fear triggers in despair.
And that's because his fate is traced and is not able to do anything because this seduced by the sensual. Instead the ethical man is capable of searching through the knowledge, seeks to control his mind in pursuit of a high-level thinking that gives reason for his existence.
Anguish is a sign that man has the eternal in itself. Without the 'eternal' would not have "anguish". But the man who has felt the anguish within himself and stubbornly persists in having a presence in the area sensual, end in despair.
However, the situation can be given that when the man through the call of desperation felt the inefficiency of their aesthetic sphere in relation to life as a sensual pleasure and joy representation; suddenly lights up and makes the decision to no longer stay there; is that moment when he is mature enough to choose “something else” and is there when he is ready to enter the ethical stage.
Kierkegaard, understood the anguish, not as the fear of living beings about the fear of death, but more than that the discovery of "The nothing".
Kierkegaard shows how anguish is related to the true constitution of subjectivity, warning of the danger of losing their identity by the desire to make absolute the "I" and "self".
For him (Kierkegaard) anguish goes beyond a simple mood to become a fundamental and decisive experience in human life. The anguish is related to sin and freedom.
Engendered by nothing, fueled by impatience, emerged as "reality of freedom as possible," anguish is "the dizziness of freedom" and at the same time a means of salvation that leads to faith and truth seeking of ultimate meaning to existence. ´
Kierkegaard understood the desperation as a deadly disease and identifies it with sin, whose faith is the antidote.
Already the “anguish” is understood as the feeling that accompanies all human decisions
Based on the thought of Kierkegaard, Heidegger claimed that there is for the "Dasein" (being in itself) a permanent possibility of to deal with "nothing" and discover it as a phenomenon.. That would be “anguish”. The way we would face "The nothing", the cure of such non-being is “anguish”.
The ability to continue to exist facing “The nothing” is what it would be given by the anguish. Jean Paul Sartre for his part identifies “anguish” as the most important feeling, to the point where he declares that “man is anguish”.
Sartre distinguishes anguish from fear. Fear appears before a specific risk and relates to the alleged injury or damage that reality can inflict, the fear is for no specific reason or any external object, it is fear of oneself, of our decisions, the consequences of our decisions.
It is the emotion or feeling that comes with the consciousness of freedom: to realize our freedom that we realize who we are and what we will be dependent on ourselves, that we are responsible for ourselves and we have no excuses , anguish appears to feel radicals responsible for our own existence.
But beyond that Sartre stressed that this awareness of responsibility increases when we realize that our choice not only concerns the purely individual but also in relation to our social environment.
To conclude this post let's say the true value of the anguish is understandable when one overcomes the aesthetic stage, while still clinging to sensuality and all that the senses give us, the anguish is only despair.
Ethics is at the stage when “The anguish” may have value, “Existence” and “Nothingness” already have meaning for humans.
So far Kierkegaard, is great, and indeed the other concepts about the “anguish” of other thinkers have their foundation in the established by Kierkegaard.
And though Kierkegaard had a tendency to become too attached to his religious temperament, making him lose some objectivity in its concepts, did not mean that their original ideas lose lucidity. In addition, his religiosity was understandable if we look at the context of what was his life.

MARDAM